Saturday, December 10, 2005

The Lost John Lennon Interview (1971)

JOHN LENNON lyrics - "Imagine"


Imagine there's no heaven


It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today...



Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace...



You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one



Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world...



You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one




As you know John Lennon was murdered Dec 8 1980, 25 years ago. He was born on Oct 9th.(1942?) By the way, despite some of his lyrics, John did wish people "Merry Christmas"


but he railed against hypocrisy and tyranny in whatever form. Despite his personal shortcomings he believed in family values and said "all you need is love."




December 8, 2005



You Can't Take Power Without a Struggle"



The Lost John Lennon Interview (1971)



By TARIQ ALI and ROBIN BLACKBURN



Editors' Note: It was twenty-five years ago today that John Lennon was
murdered outside the Dakota building on Central Park West in New York
City. We doubt many CounterPunchers have read the following 1971
interview with Lennon done by CounterPunchers Tariq Ali and Robin
Blackburn. It's a lot more interesting that the interminable Q and A
with Lennon done by Rolling Stone's Jann Wenner. Tariq and Robin
allowed Lennon to talk and spurred him on when he showed signs of
flagging. Lennon recounts about how he and George Harrison bucked their
handlers and went on record against the Vietnam War, discusses class
politics in an engaging manner, defends country and western music and
the blues, suggests Dylan's best songs stem from revolutionary Irish
and Scottish ballads and dissects his three versions of "Revolution".
The interview ran in The Red Mole , a Trotskyist sheet put out by the
British arm of the Fourth International. As you'll see, those were
different days. The interview is included in Tariq Ali's Streetfighting
Years , recently published by Verso. AC / JSC


The Interview Can Be Found: HERE

On This 'Human Rights Day' 2005 - Our Amnesiac Torture Debate

The full article can be found on the web at:  The Nation - 'Never Before!' Our Amnesiac Torture Debate


posted December 8, 2005 (December 26, 2005 issue)


Naomi Klein




Cross Posted At: Booman Tribune



It was the "Mission Accomplished" of George W. Bush's second term, and an announcement of that magnitude called for a suitably dramatic location. But what was the right backdrop for the infamous "We do not torture" declaration? With characteristic audacity, the Bush team settled on downtown Panama City.



It was certainly bold. An hour and a half's drive from where Bush stood, the US military ran the notorious School of the Americas from 1946 to 1984, a sinister educational institution that, if it had a motto, might have been "We do torture." It is here in Panama and, later, at the school's new location in Fort Benning, Georgia, where the roots of the current torture scandals can be found. According to declassified training manuals, SOA students--military and police officers from across the hemisphere--were instructed in many of the same "coercive interrogation" techniques that have since migrated to Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib: early morning capture to maximize shock, immediate hooding and blindfolding, forced nudity, sensory deprivation, sensory overload, sleep and food "manipulation," humiliation, extreme temperatures, isolation, stress positions--and worse. In 1996 President Clinton's Intelligence Oversight Board admitted that US-produced training materials condoned "execution of guerrillas, extortion, physical abuse, coercion and false imprisonment."




                       


                        SOA - Watch


And yet when covering the Bush announcement, not a single mainstream news outlet mentioned the sordid history of its location. How could they? To do so would require something totally absent from the current debate: an admission that the embrace of torture by US officials long predates the Bush Administration and has in fact been integral to US foreign policy since the Vietnam War.

It's a history that has been exhaustively documented in an avalanche of books, declassified documents, CIA training manuals, court records and truth commissions. In his upcoming book A Question of Torture, Alfred McCoy synthesizes this unwieldy cache of evidence, producing an indispensable and riveting account of how monstrous CIA-funded experiments on psychiatric patients and prisoners in the 1950s turned into a template for what he calls "no-touch torture," based on sensory deprivation and self-inflicted pain. McCoy traces how these methods were field-tested by CIA agents in Vietnam as part of the Phoenix program and then imported to Latin America and Asia under the guise of police training programs.



The principal propagator of this narrative (what Garry Wills termed "original sinlessness") is Senator John McCain. Writing recently in Newsweek on the need for a ban on torture, McCain says that when he was a prisoner of war in Hanoi, he held fast to the knowledge "that we were different from our enemies...that we, if the roles were reversed, would not disgrace ourselves by committing or approving such mistreatment of them." It is a stunning historical distortion. By the time McCain was taken captive, the CIA had already launched the Phoenix program and, as McCoy writes, "its agents were operating forty interrogation centers in South Vietnam that killed more than twenty thousand suspects and tortured thousands more," a claim he backs up with pages of quotes from press reports as well as Congressional and Senate probes.



Other cultures deal with a legacy of torture by declaring "Never again!" Why do so many Americans insist on dealing with the current torture crisis by crying "Never Before"? I suspect it has to do with a sincere desire to convey the seriousness of this Administration's crimes. And the Bush Administration's open embrace of torture is indeed unprecedented--but let's be clear about what is unprecedented about it: not the torture but the openness. Past administrations tactfully kept their "black ops" secret; the crimes were sanctioned but they were practiced in the shadows, officially denied and condemned. The Bush Administration has broken this deal: Post-9/11, it demanded the right to torture without shame, legitimized by new definitions and new laws.




Visit my Diary's of 12-9-05 Celebrating Human Rights in the Midst of a Global Torture Debate - "End Torture Now!" It's the theme of this year's Human Rights Day





HERE


Or


HERE


For a number of Links to Articles, Reports, etc. On Human Rights Day - 2005


In Latin America the revelations of US torture in Iraq have not been met with shock and disbelief but with powerful déjà vu and reawakened fears. Hector Mondragon, a Colombian activist who was tortured in the 1970s by an officer trained at the School of the Americas, wrote: "It was hard to see the photos of the torture in Iraq because I too was tortured. I saw myself naked with my feet fastened together and my hands tied behind my back. I saw my own head covered with a cloth bag. I remembered my feelings--the humiliation, pain." Dianna Ortiz, an American nun who was brutally tortured in a Guatemalan jail, said, "I could not even stand to look at those photographs...so many of the things in the photographs had also been done to me. I was tortured with a frightening dog and also rats. And they were always filming."



The result is that the memory of US complicity in far-away crimes remains fragile, living on in old newspaper articles, out-of-print books and tenacious grassroots initiatives like the annual protests outside the School of the Americas (which has been renamed but remains largely unchanged). The terrible irony of the anti-historicism of the current torture debate is that in the name of eradicating future abuses, these past crimes are being erased from the record. Every time Americans repeat the fairy tale about their pre-Cheney innocence, these already hazy memories fade even further. The hard evidence still exists, of course, carefully archived in the tens of thousands of declassified documents available from the National Security Archive. But inside US collective memory, the disappeared are being disappeared all over again.



And that's the problem with pretending that the Bush Administration invented torture. "If you don't understand the history and the depths of the institutional and public complicity," says McCoy, "then you can't begin to undertake meaningful reforms." Lawmakers will respond to pressure by eliminating one small piece of the torture apparatus--closing a prison, shutting down a program, even demanding the resignation of a really bad apple like Rumsfeld. But, McCoy says, "they will preserve the prerogative to torture."



                       


                        Center for American Progress - "Torture is not US."

Friday, December 09, 2005

Human Rights Day (10 December 2005)

Celebrating Human Rights in the Midst of a Global Torture Debate


"End Torture Now!" It's the theme of this year's Human Rights Day, celebrated Saturday on the anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 1948 and has become the standard for promoting and protecting human rights around the world.


The following wasn't compiled by me but sent from Global News - One World.net for which I subscribe. They have compiled the important links within and as myself feel this should be shared by many, especially with what has been going on in this So Called 'War On Terrorism' and the 'War In Iraq', which untill Invaded was not connected to the first! They do a great job in many of their postings giving commentary and backround studies, reports, news for personal study guides and understanding!





On 10 December 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which has become a universal standard for defending and promoting human rights. Every year on 10 December, Human Rights Day marks the adoption of the Universal Declaration. On Human Rights Day it is celebrated around the globe that "All human beings are born with equal and inalienable rights and fundamental freedoms".
The theme of Human Rights Day 2005 is "End Torture Now!". Torture is a crime under international law. According to all relevant instruments, it is absolutely prohibited and cannot be justified under any circumstances. This prohibition forms part of customary international law, which means that it is binding on every member of the international community, regardless of whether a State has ratified international treaties in which torture is expressly prohibited. The systematic or widespread practice of torture constitutes a crime against humanity.










Selected learning materials


Study guide on Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (HREA)

A short introduction to torture. It present definitions, key rights at stake, human rights instruments, and protection and assistance agencies. The guide also offer links to the full text of international treaties, and other useful resources on the HREA and University of Minnesota Human Rights Library web sites.


Discovering the UDHR (Amnesty International-USA)

By examining two real cases of human rights abuses students are introduced to the contents and spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).>br>

Human Rights Here & Now: Celebrating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

This manual is intended to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to further human rights education in the United States. It can be used by educators in classrooms, by human rights advocates in informal settings, and by individuals for their own self-learning.


Illustrated version of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

A simplified and illustrated version of the 30 articles of the UDHR. Intended for children eight year and older. Accompanied with instructions for a lesson activity.


Learning Activities about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Some ideas to help you explore images through a human rights lens.


Rights Around the World: A UDHR Jigsaw (Amnesty International-USA)

This activity allows students to extend their knowledge of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) while learning typical rights abuses around the world. It also provides structure for collaborative learning in the classroom.


The UDHR: What's in it for Me?

Through this exercise workshop participants will become more familiar with the provisions of the UDHR's 30 articles; will acquire cognitive and analytical skills in applying the UDHR to specific problems; and will become empowered to apply rights principles in their real life circumstances.


What are Human Rights? - The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Estonia)

Chapter from a textbook for an optional subject in grade eight of general comprehensive schools.


The United Nations' System of Human Rights Protection: Educational packet (Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights in Poland)

This packet familiarises the advocates with the human rights protection mechanisms that exist within the United Nations. Included in this packet are an instructors text, fundamental UN human rights documents, a videotape and lesson plans for presenting the UN human rights system.










My thoughts on adding commentary to the above, and not being a writer, would have garbled a simple announcement about an Important Day - Tomorrow - and the Debate that Really Shouldn't Need To Be Even Discussed, except for the growing knowledge of what has been going on by those we Hire to Represent Us as the Nation, The United States of America!
For this is Not the Country now that we were led to believe it was, it is More a Rogue Nation than a Shining House on the Hill to be Admired! And no more can we Ask "Why Do They Hate Us?"!

Thursday, December 08, 2005

What Iraqi Forces?

What Iraqi Forces?

Elizabeth Spiro Clark

December 08, 2005



Elizabeth Spiro Clark is a retired career foreign service officer and writes extensively on issues of global democratization.


No one is playing with a full deck of cards on the great "withdraw from Iraq" game. To the American public’s ear, "training Iraqi forces" means training forces under the control of the "Iraqi government" with the aim of turning over to them the job of fighting jihadists and the insurgency so the U.S. can withdraw. But this is not the reality behind the words.


The Kurdish authorities exposed the fallacy when the press reported the Kurdish provincial government had entered into negotiations with a Norwegian company for exploration of new oil fields—without apparently informing the Iraqi government. The Kurds cited provisions in the new Iraqi Constitution that split revenue from existing oil fields among the provinces but remains silent on any division of revenue from new finds. Gen. Wesley Clark, in a Washington Post op-ed Dec. 5, scolded the Kurds and the Iraqis who, he said "must" amend the constitution to change this provision.


As with oil revenues, so to with regional government’s control over security in the new constitution. Even with the four-month period we are entering for further revising the constitution, it seems unlikely the Kurds and Shiites would have any reason to give up powers granted them by the constitution—not only over oil revenues but also over internal security—however much the U.S. scolds.


Marine Brig. Gen. James Williams underlined this strategic flaw on security in reports he gave to The Washington Post on negotiations between tribal leaders and the U.S. military that took place on Nov. 29 in Ramadi. The Post reported the tribal leaders came to the meeting only to discuss American withdrawal. The Americans were there, Williams said, to persuade the tribal leaders to let their people join the Iraqi government forces, instead of tribal militias—which would allow the American forces to turn over security to the "legitimate" government. The tribal leaders, in response, insisted that Americans should let the tribal leaders build up their own forces. "It undermines Iraqi security," Gen. Martin Dempsey later said, commenting on the Ramadi meeting, that "Iraqi leaders" want to maintain their own thinly disguised militias.


The reality is that the thinly disguised militias are going to be the regular units that are in charge of internal security, answering to the regional governments that are given dominant power in the Iraqi constitution.


Just how weak the federal government is going to be in the security area, and how strong the regions, is only slowly coming to light. The result of Rep. John Murtha’s call for withdrawal was the opening up of a "debate" on how well we were doing training "Iraqi forces." The reality is still smothered in misleading talk of the "divided loyalties" of troops between their sectarian and regional militia commanders and the "Iraqi army," and the "infiltration" of army and police units by militias. Reality is also obscured by taking problems with the Iraqi constitution out of the debate to be put down the road and labeled as yet another benchmark of Iraq’s march to democracy.


To read the Iraqi Constitution , however, is to understand that if it survives, Iraq is going to be one of the weakest federal states in the world. The federal government has limited exclusive powers, among them signing treaties, receiving ambassadors, establishing weights and measures and allocating the broadband spectrum. The federal government is responsible for security on Iraqi borders and defense of Iraq. However, "All that is not written in the exclusive powers of the federal Authorities are in the authority of the regions. In other powers shared between the federal government and the regions, the priority will be given to the Region’s law in case of dispute" (Constitution, Article 111). As to the power of the regions: "The region's government is responsible for all that is required to manage the region, in particular establishing and organizing internal security forces for the region such as police, security and regional guards" (Constitution, Article 117).


It is extreme wishful thinking to suppose that the Shia and Kurds are going to compromise away the powers of autonomy they have won in this constitution. Why would they? If the constitution comes into effect as planned in April, we can help the Iraqis with their border security, but most internal security will be the responsibility of the regions—not the national Iraqi government we will have "stood up." The Murtha plan at least takes reality as its starting point; the latest Bush "plan" takes no more account of reality than did the earlier ones.

Architech Of 'WMD' Spin Now Says War Wouldn't Have Happened, If Only----------!!! {Say What Wolfie?}

Wolfowitz Says Iraq War Might Not Have Occurred if United States Knew Hussein Had No WMD








Former U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said yesterday that the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq might not have occurred if the United States had known there were no weapons of mass destruction in the country, Agence France-Presse reported (see GSN
, Dec. 5).



“I'm not sure based on the evidence we know now that we could have been absolutely convinced that there was no danger, absolutely no danger,” Wolfowitz, a chief promoter of the invasion who is now president of the World Bank, said at the National Press Club. “If somebody could have given you a Lloyd’s of London guarantee that weapons of mass destruction would not possibly be used, one would have contemplated much more support for internal Iraqi opposition and not having the United States take the job on the way we did.”



“It was a sense that the greatest danger in taking this man on would be that he would use them,” said Wolfowitz of former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. “If you could have given us a guarantee that they wouldn't have been used, there would have been policy options available probably.”



When asked how he accounted for U.S. intelligence failures before the war, Wolfowitz said, “Well, I don't have to, and it's not just because I don't work for the U.S. government anymore. In my old job, I didn't have to. I was like everyone else outside the intelligence community” (Agence France-Presse/Yahoo!News
, Dec. 7).



Meanwhile, the United States joined Algeria in calling for the U.N. Security Council to end U.N. weapons inspections in Iraq, the Associated Press reported (see GSN
, Dec. 6).



U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission inspectors were forced to leave the country before the March 2003 invasion. The agency since the war began has only reviewed satellite imagery to monitor equipment that could be used by the military.



“We believe that Iraq has entered a new era and should be treated as a normal country where disarmament conventions should apply,” said Abdallah Baali, Algeria’s U.N. ambassador. U.S. Ambassador John Bolton and other delegates supported Baali’s statement, AP reported.



The Security Council agreed to address the matter early next year, said British Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry (Associated Press/Khaleej Times
), Dec. 7).



===========


The Real Spirit Of The Season







"I think it's more important to put Christ back into our war planning than into our Christmas cards."


— Rev. Bob Edgar, a former Democratic congressman, in response to right-wingers who are angry that the presidential greeting card (pictured above) doesn't mention Christmas.

Tuesday, December 06, 2005

Riverbend - Mother of All Trials...

And She's Waiting For It, Last Sentence!



Baghdad Burning
...
I'll meet you 'round the bend my friend, where hearts can heal and souls can mend...


Monday, December 05, 2005

Mother of All Trials...




And




Violence in Iraq: A Snake with a Hundred Heads



Nightly shootings, daily suicide attacks, and a flourishing kidnapping business have made life in Iraq increasingly unbearable. Are fanatical jihadists and frustrated Saddam Hussein supporters pushing the country toward civil war?

No Exceptions

No Exceptions to the Ban on Torture

Louise Arbour International Herald Tribune



TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2005





GENEVA The absolute ban on torture, a cornerstone of the international human rights edifice, is under attack. The principle we once believed to be unassailable - the inherent right to physical integrity and dignity of the person - is becoming a casualty of the so-called war on terror



SNIP Rest At: HERE

Monday, December 05, 2005

PEACE Does Take Courage

Peace Takes Courage

NOVEMBER IN IRAQ

Flash Video

Deja Vu (All Over Again) in pictures

A Friend and Fellow Member of Veterans For Peace {Chapter 72} posted the following as a Diary at Daily KOS {I will post only a few of the photo's he has in the Diary and giving an idea of the Video of "Deja Vu (All Over Again) w/Photos!!



by BOHICA

Mon Dec 05, 2005 at 11:13:53 AM EST

"Iraq is not like Viet Nam." You've all heard this by the apologists for the war. John Fogarty wrote this song a while back and it keeps going over and over in my head. I thought, "What would a pictorial comparison look like?" Having many images collected on my computer, I started putting together a compilation of them with the words from the song. I couldn't stop there so I put them to the music in a slide show video format. You can download it Here




The "precious child" is Joe Blickenstaff, KIA December 8, 2003, the brother of a friend of mine. The first and third "voice inside" pics are members of my VFP chapter and symbolize that "voice". The second "voice inside" pic just seemed to fit as another example of the pain felt by those who have "seen the elephant."
The picture of the veteran in the wheelchair in the shower is from an issue of Life magazine from May 22,1970, which I put up as a Diary, "Our Forgotten Wounded", a heartbreaking look at the state of the VA system back then.
I put this video on a DVD along with some others to show when I give a presentation to High Schools. The DVD is then given to the school for their library along with a CD containing counter recruitment materials and other articles and commentary about war and peace. It's what I do in my small way to try and help educated the students to the realities of today.






ON POWER

ON POWER

AN OPEN LETTER TO CONGRESS FROM A VETERAN AND MILITARY DAD



As posted on Friend and Fellow Veterans For Peace Member, Special Forces - Retired, Author/Public Speaker, Blog; Feral Scholar - Stan Goff






By Stan Goff


(Disclaiming in advance for the rare exceptions in Congress)


If there is one thing we can always count on, it’s politicians who walk over human corpses to show fear only in the face of something as formless and abstract as an opinion poll. The veterans and military families antiwar movement are well-versed on so-called realism – and that deference we are supposed to exercise when we approach elected officials, hat in hand, for a few crumbs of your attention and support.


We understand power very well.


You are fighting each other for your careers, and you are retaining your power over us through distance and guile, and trying to promote that power by pretending you are hearing our “concerns.” But we have more than “concerns” at stake here.


It is because we understand power that we haven’t the slightest intention of allowing ourselves to be used to promote your careers past the 2006 elections. If you fail to demand US withdrawal now, you are supporting the war; and if you support the war, as far as we are concerned, you can go straight to hell in 2006.>br>

It is because we understand power that we are not going to forgive and forget that when the war fever was up, fed by the lies of Republicans, the war was facilitated by the eager xenophobic complicity of most Democrats, and by the slavish obedience of the corporate press. Most of you not only co-signed what you knew to be an illegal invasion – you have continued to sign the checks to perpetuate the war.


You wanted to be lied to about the war, because the polls supported the war, and you were sniffing the political air.


It is because we understand power that we know that most of you did this out of craven opportunism and a concern for your political ambitions – knowing full well that no one you loved was likely to be sent home without a limb, without an eye, without a life.


It is because we understand power that we know how cynically cavalier you are with the lives of others, and how narcissistically self-promoting.


It is because we understand power that we understand why many of you are backpedaling in your support for the war. You are maneuvering to be “critical” of the war. You “demand” the administration provide “an effective exit strategy.” And you haven’t said a goddamned substantive thing, as the cameras shutter away for you. And you want us to play along – so you can beat Republicans without taking a single real position. You don’t want to stop this war. You want to win an election. By the time you win that election, another thousand troops and another 20,000 Iraqis could be dead. We do not calculate time the way you do.


It is because we understand power that we know most of you will stand by while those of us with less privilege see our loved ones sent to kill and die. The real corpses produced by the exercise of power are no more to you than a political calculation.


We understand power, because we know what really stands behind it. Power is embodied in the mounted cops you use to police our protests. Power is expressed by the armed guards for your gated communities. Power is the ability to kill and maim and get away with it, even if you dress it up in $5,000 suits and trot it out on the talk-show circuit, on C-Span, in your interviews with CNN.


Power is projected onto other peoples using your Cruise missiles and A-10s and Bradley fighting vehicles and the people who join the military. And the price of that power doesn’t merely come from our pockets. We probably wouldn’t fight you about how you rob us for your pork barrel defense contracts. The price that has us in motion right now – you really must understand this, because it means we will never back off – is exacted on the bodies of human beings.


The price is exacted with mortars, with IEDs, with high powered rifle ammunition, with bombs, with the same A-10s and Bradleys; and it is exacted on the bodies of our loved ones and the loved ones of the Iraqi people.


That’s why we are not going to grant you the power to manipulate us, to contain us, to corral us, or to pimp our grief over this war and its costs on behalf of your political careers or the needs of a political party. That’s why were are going to be rudely explicit when we say that your bombast against the Bush administration – as if they did this without your help – in calling for a more effective “exit strategy” and demanding that people merely think about a plan for withdrawal from Iraq that will take months or years… this verbiage is meaningless and manipulative. We will never stand for studying a withdrawal, for phasing a withdrawal, for delaying a withdrawal, for setting conditions for a withdrawal, or for partial withdrawal. Never.


Our demand from the beginning remains unchanged. It is for withdrawal, and for immediate, unilateral, unconditional withdrawal; and if political careers go up in smoke as a consequence, we do not give a good goddamn. People are dying in Iraq as a direct result of this war every single day. Go back to your fucking law offices and let our children live.


Gradual, phased, planned, strategized, conditioned, delayed, partial withdrawals get implemented, if at all, while those military sedans continue to roll up in front of people’s houses to announce the extinction of a human being to his or her family… and while the bodies are dropped into the fresh graves at the cemeteries of Iraq.


Gradual, phased, planned, strategized, conditioned, delayed, partial withdrawals get implemented, if at all, while the poisons accumulate in the soil and water and food of Iraq, and in the bodies of Iraqis and occupation troops.


Gradual, phased, planned, strategized, conditioned, delayed, partial withdrawals get implemented, if at all, while the hospitals fill up with the lamed, maimed, blinded, and disfigured.


Gradual, phased, planned, strategized, conditioned, delayed, partial withdrawals get implemented, if at all, while the grief and horror associated with this criminal war become the daily emotional fare of more and more people, occupation forces and Iraqis.


No member of Congress has the moral right to dither on the question of his or her precious career while a single constituent is facing the fear of that devastating knock on the door. We say the emperor has no clothes; and we say we know you when you feign “concern” with your eye fixed firmly on your ambition.


An exit is not a strategy. An exit is a command.


If the commander in chief won’t give that command, then you in Congress – if you want to salvage anything that looks vaguely like a conscience or a soul – will refuse to grant this administration another penny to continue this war. We are not hearing you when you tap dance about political “realism.” The mounting mass of corpses, that you have walked over every time you voted a cent to continue this war, is about as real as it gets. Don’t you dare ever lecture military families and veterans about realism. And don’t you doubt that we understand power.


You may think you can respond to your careerist concerns in the face of reversing polls. You may think you can pretend to do something, that you can bewilder us into accepting half a loaf better than none.


To the tiny handful of you in Congress who have said what we say, “Out Now!,” we commend you and thank you for your principled voices.


To those of you who are openly supporting this criminal administration, we’ll see you in the street, and history will consign your names to the chapters about imperial bullying, comb-over machismo, and cognitive mediocrity.


To those of you who call for half measures, phases, and strategies, you are directly in front of us now. You are standing directly in our path, and we are not going to go around you.


We are not going to commend you on being “better” than the reactionaries.


We are not going to thank you for our half a loaf.


We are not going to try and give you the political cover you need to wiggle around those shifting opinion polls while you salvage your careers.


We do not love you. We find your ambivalence contemptible.


We love the people who are facing the real consequences of this war while you schmooze your way through the chicken-salad circuits of imperial power, nattering on about realism and phases and strategies.


You will not divert our attention away from you. You will redirect neither our anger nor our will away from you. It is you who are standing directly in our way; and every time you try to dicker about people’s lives with us like we are in street market, every time you try to pimp our outrage at this crime, as a mere “concern” that only you are entitled to address with your careerist half-measures, we will call you to account. We will embarrass you. We will shine a spotlight on your cowardice, your opportunism, and your grotesque cynical hypocrisy.


November 2006 is not an election to us; it is a body count. If you think you can take us for granted over an election, think again.


Get it right, because we have never wavered on our position. The mass of American society is moving toward us, not you. They are listening more and more to us, and less and less to you. We are about saving lives, not saving face. So get it right, and get it right fast. We are looking at your political house with an eye to pulling it down.


We understand power very well.


*Comments to this writing can be made HERE.

And other Postings and Comments can be made HERE.*

*Or you can post your comment here and I'll pass them on to Stan*

Sunday, December 04, 2005

SUCCESS IN IRAQ

Bringing More American Culture/Freedom/Democracy To Iraq, Rather Quickly!


Along with Guerilla War/Civil War/Puppet Gov./Killing-Maiming/DU/PTSD,Not Bad At All,SUCCESS comes in Many American Forms, just look around you!









Iraqis turn to drugs to escape reality









Sunday 04 December 2005 5:27 AM GMT





[Tranquilizer pills are among the drugs being abused]






On Saddun Street in central Baghdad, there is a pharmacist who does not like to sell his products.



"Dozens of people come every day to buy tranquilizer pills, but we know now which ones are addicted and we refuse to sell to them," he said, adding that many of the addicts are criminals and thieves.


The pharmacy is located next to the Battawin neighbourhood, notorious for its drug and alcohol problem.


"One of them threatened me with a gun and stole my car," said a neighbour of the pharmacist.


But Iraq's rising drug problem is not limited to select neighbourhoods, as young people are increasingly seeking solace in prescription drugs to escape a world of violence, unemployment and despair.


"It is a dangerous plague that has to be confronted immediately, before it becomes uncontrollable," said Dr Adnan Fawzi, assistant to the director of the Ministry of Health's national programme to combat drug addiction.


Finding an escape



Heroin and cocaine use, according to Fawzi, is actually fairly rare, due to the high prices of these drugs.





["The unbearable conditions of daily life, whether in society or in my family, pushed me to find an escape"
Ali, 18, an addict]






Instead, people are using pills that are "available for nothing in pharmacies", he said.


Dr Ali Rashid of the Ibn Rushd hospital, who specialises in psychiatry and drug addiction, explains that these pills, like illegal drugs, marginalise their users in a conservative society.


For Ali, 18, his pills allow him to forget his problems. "I float along in another world," he said.



"The unbearable conditions of daily life, whether in society or in my family, pushed me to find an escape," he added.


Social responsibility




Families and educational institutions have a major portion of the responsibility to prevent this problem, maintains social worker Nagham Wannass.




[In one area, over1000 homeless,
mostly children, are affected]






In the troubled neighbourhood of Battawin, this problem affects "more than 1000 homeless, most of them children" said an official in the Ministry of Interior, who declined to be identified.


In addition to drugs, they often abuse alcohol and sniff glue, he added.


The Health Ministry, whose hospitals are already swamped with victims of the daily violence, is trying to grapple with this problem and has sent large number of doctors and specialists abroad to receive training.




Border concerns



In November, the ministry organised a conference entitled: For An Iraq Free Of Drugs, and participants called on the authorities to tighten control of the borders, particularly with Iran, to halt the flow of drugs.


A conference of the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) in Vienna back in May noted how smugglers were taking advantage of the internal chaos in Iraq to route Afghani-produced heroin through Iraq and into Europe.


Right now, however, the drugs are getting into people's hands through the legal means of pharmacies.



The national anti-drug commission, headed by the Minister of Health Abdul Mutalib Muhammad Ali, has called for new rules regulating the sale of prescription drugs.


The commission, which includes representatives of the Education, Labour and Interior ministries, has also launched an awareness campaign.


All over Baghdad, walls are plastered with anti-drug posters, showing a man in rags slumped against a wall, while lying at his feet another shoots up with a syringe.





You can find this article at:HERE

Honor the Dead, Demand the Truth

Honor the Dead, Demand the Truth

AfterDowningStreet.org

List of Iraqi civilian martyrs killed in Fallujah by chemical weapons used by the Americans in their assault on the city in April 2004



Fallujah Victims



And A Reply To Post:



The truth? Would you settle for a German fariy tale?

Submitted by Arvy on Sat, 2005-12-03 20:51.


It tells of the giant's daughter, who found a peasant plowing his field and brought him home in her handkerchief to show to her father. But the father said gravely: "The peasant is no toy!" and told her to put him gently back where she had found him.



The United States reminds me of the giant's daughter. Unfortunately, she has paid no heed to any wise advice that nations are not toys.



When Geroge W Bush became president, he brought with him a bunch of neo-conservatives who believed, in their incredible arrogance, that it is possible to overturn nations, change their regimes at will, and take control of their resources.



For starters, they intended to put Iraq, Iran and Syria in their handkerchief. Iraq and Iran because of their oil, Syria because of its strategic location. Quite incidentally, these three countries were also considered a strategic threat by Israel, and the neo-cons, most of them themselves Jews, were glad to do the "Jewish State" a favor.



The question was which of the three to conquer first, and the choice fell, as we know, on Iraq. Since the neo-cons were sure that their army would be received there with flowers (how else?) and the war would be over in a jiffy, the next question was who would come next, the eastern or the western neighbor.



Today, in retrospect, one can wonder which was the greater: the ignorance of the neo-cons or their arrogance. They had no idea about Iraq, and it seems that this did not bother them. After all, they knew that one stroke would suffice to finish the job and allow them to move on.



If they had consulted their British allies, they might have learned something about the country they were about to attack, for example that Iraq had never been a real state. It was composed of three distinct regions which had been joined together by the British Empire to suit its interests. It always needed a dictatorship to keep the package intact: first the British rulers themselves, later on assorted local dictators. Saddam Hussein was only the latest in the series.



When the US army destroyed the power that held it together, the whole thing fell apart. Today, two parallel wars are tearing the poor country into shreds: the Sunni rebellion against the American occupation, and a three-fold civil war. In Washington, politicians blabber about the new Iraqi army that will, at any moment now, take over responsibility for security and allow the withdrawal of most American forces. In practice, there is no real Iraqi army at all, only separate militias of Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis, each of them ultimately loyal only to their particular leaders.



The Americans would like to withdraw most of their forces from Iraq and leave behind only a small garrison, to secure their hold on the oil resources. This is a rapidly fading dream. The end will probably be like Vietnam. American public opinion will come to detest the hopeless war and the army will withdraw with its tail between its legs, and leave behind a general state of anarchy.



You can read the rest of the tale as told by Uri Avnery HERE.

__


“Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of the law, for my own safety’s sake!” -- Sir Thomas More